Showing posts with label Harry Reid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Reid. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Senate Democrats beat back GOP

Senator Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader

After nearly 9-1/2 hours of back-to-back votes that went until nearly 3 a.m., the Senate reconvenes Thursday morning to rank work on a House collection of “fixes” to the sweeping aid reforms subscribed into law on Tuesday.


But anyone sleeping through the late-night action need not vexation most missing something big. Some of the specially thickened votes are likely to be repackaged as campaign ads for fall midterm elections.

In a process dubbed vote-a-rama, the Senate voted down 29 Republican amendments to aid reform, on near-party-line votes. The votes, however, did put senators on record on issues ranging from tax hikes and back-room deals for certain states to gay marriage in the District of Columbia and whether to ban Medicare payments to cover Viagra for sex offenders.


Healthcare 101: What the calculate means to you


Senate body had hoped to pass the collection of House fixes without amendment, thus sending this carry-on calculate straightforward to the Oval Office for the president’s signature. That meant fighting back every GOP amendments, including some that are popular with the public.


“I will oppose any amendment no matter how good that amendment may be,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California, noting the grandness of keeping the aid governing intact.

'Fixes' collection back to the House


With the occasional exception, Democrats did in fact stop together through 29 thickened votes, defeating every one. But Republicans found two secondary procedural points, expected to be raised on the story Thursday, that will require adjustments in a student give manoeuvre included in the aid fixes. That means a revised fixes collection will need to go back to the House for a re-vote. Anticipating this possibility, House body are holding the House in session through the weekend before a two-week break, if necessary.


“These changes do not impact the reforms to the student give programs and the important investments in education,” said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate majority leader Harry Reid.


The essential point, Senate Democratic body say, is that the Senate is on track pass the House fixes without any substantive changes. Many amendments proposed by Republicans would have significantly reworked the new law.


Amendments Republicans offered


Sen. Judd Gregg (R) of New county opened the sequence of votes with an amendment to block the use of some $500 billion in Medicare funding for a new entitlement – an amendment that would have gutted financing for the aid bill. He proposed, instead, that any savings in Medicare to be used to increase Medicare solvency. Two Democrats, Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Jim economist of Virginia, joined every Republican senators in voting for this amendment, which was tabled (derailed) by a vote of 56 to 42.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Dems predict historic House vote

Barack Obama delivering his electoral victory ...

WASHINGTON — House Democrats are predicting that a rare Sunday session module display digit of the most significant legislative triumphs in decades: passage of a past calculate to overhaul the nation's upbeat care system to provide news to millions of grouping who currently lack it.

Republicans resolutely anti to the calculate didn't concede defeat Saturday, but warned they module make Democrats clear affectionately in the start elections if the fiercely debated measure becomes law.

With President Barack Obama's emotional attractiveness from Sat ringing in their ears, House Democratic leaders prepared for three showdown votes Sunday: on a "rule" to found speaking guidelines; on a package of changes to a Senate-passed bill, including redaction of special Medicaid benefits for Nebraska; and on the senate calculate itself, the focus of intense national speaking for months.

Democrats need 216 votes to transfer apiece one. With every 178 Republicans and at least two dozen Democrats vowing to vote no, the legislation's fate lies in the safekeeping of about 20 Democrats who remained floating late Saturday.

Party leaders appeared overconfident that most would break in favor of the bills. They pointed to Obama's emotional speech to the caucus at the Capitol, and they cited a sense of momentum from the handful of rank-and-file Democrats who hit announced their hold over the past several days.

Obama told House Democrats they hit arrived at "one of those moments" when they can realize their highest aspirations in public life.

"This is digit of those times where you can honestly say to yourself, 'Doggone it, this is exactly why I came here,'" he said. "'Because I conceive so deeply in this land and I conceive so deeply in this democracy and I'm willing to stand up modify when it's hard."

If Democratic leaders prevail on every three House votes, Obama could sign the senate version of the calculate into law. The calculate of "fixes" would go to the senate low fast-track speaking rules that would enable Democrats to transfer it without facing a Republican filibuster.

Democrats control 59 of the Senate's 100 seats, digit vote shy of the number needed to overcome bill-killing filibusters from a united GOP.

House Democrats hit long insisted that senators concord to change the calculate that the senate passed on Christmas Eve. Since then, it became deeply unpopular with many Americans, because of the special deal for Nebraska, a newborn tax on generous employer-provided upbeat plans and other aspects.

In a sign of crescendo Democratic confidence Saturday, House leaders dropped plans for a controversial parliamentary tactic. They agreed to allow a simple yes-or-no vote on the senate bill. By thinking to transfer the package of fixes on the aforementioned day, Democrats hope they can persuade constituents they did not hold the senate measure as a stand-alone bill.

The legislation, affecting virtually every American and more than a year in the making, would extend news to an estimated 32 meg uninsured, bar insurers from denying news on the basis of existing medical conditions and revilement federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion over a decade.

Congressional analysts estimate the cost of the two bills compounded would be $940 billion over a decade.

House leaders continued to negotiate late Sat with a handful of anti-abortion Democrats who threatened to switch from "yes" to "no" on the legislation without greater assurances that no federal money low the newborn laws would be used for nonappointive abortions.

It was unclear whether Obama would concord to supply an executive order along those lines. Long-standing federal policy bars U.S. aid for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother's life is in danger.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other crowning Democrats who joined Obama on Sat spoke of the upbeat legislation in past terms, citing the many presidents who tried and failed to rewrite the nation's laws. Several cited tales of ordinary Americans struggling to clear bills when insurance companies denied or revilement soured coverage.

Republicans who vow to do every they can to kibosh the legislation in either congressional room "are not meet delaying the inevitable, they are delaying the imperative," said senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts with Thumbnails